The Senate on Wednesday upped pressure on the House to pass a $700 billion rescue for Wall Street by strongly approving a plan that supporters said would avert a potential economic disaster.
In a maneuver to reverse a stinging House rejection of the plan, the Senate piggybacked the bailout plan on several other popular measures: an increase in federal deposit insurance limits, expanded health coverage for mental illnesses and a bill extending several tax breaks set to expire at year’s end.
New measures added to the bill include:
- Authority for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to insure bank deposits up to $250,000. The current limit is $100,000.
- An extension of business tax breaks — including one to protect middle-class wage-earners from a bigger tax bite under the alternative minimum tax.
- A bill requiring health insurers to offer mental health coverage on a par with other medical benefits.
To be honest with you I can’t see how adding these things to the bill would make it that much more palatable to the congressmen who voted it down previously, but maybe they think these things will make it more acceptable to their constiuents who are not happy with this bailout. By all accounts phone calls to the capital switchboard are running against the bailout 10-1.
Also in the news this week the SEC eased mark-to-market rules that some say helped to cause this problem in the first place. This was step two of Dave Ramsey’s plan to fix this situation.
House Republicans also welcomed a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.
While I haven’t been completely behind this bailout plan, it does look like it has a pretty good chance of passing this week. Already some of the congressmen who voted against it last week are signaling that they’re more likely to vote for it this week. So hold on, it’s gonna be a bumpy ride!
The Happy Rock says
The funny part is that the bill has yet to change at all, right? It has only grown in scope and size by adding more mostly inconsequential stuff. I hope that it doesn’t sway people, although I suspect it will.
I wrote in to my rep yesterday against the bailout.
Peter says
that’s right – funny, but not a ha ha kinda funny. Let’s add more things to the bill – and then it’ll be a “better” bill! I like the idea of less is more myself.
Matt says
there should be a page limit for bills congress is allowed to pass. Seriously how many pages is the constitution? if the founding documents of this country can be this brief any subsequent laws should be as brief…
yes I live in a fantasy world, I know.
Matts last blog post..Grapes! [1]
Peter says
Brief bills would mean they wouldn’t be able to stuff the bills full of pork. that would NEVER happen! (unfortunately)